Hi Michal, I was able to gather a level 5 trace of the neighbor gatekeeper failed call. It looks like the issue is with the error that I get "Q931s Unregistered party is NATed. Not supported by policy. 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 4 ProxyChannel.cxx(1627) Q931s GWRewrite source for 72.233.250.179:1220: neighbor or explicit IP 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 3 gkauth.cxx(1067) GKAUTH default Setup check ok 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 5 Routing.cxx(201) ROUTING Checking policy Explicit for request Setup CRV=22781 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 5 Routing.cxx(201) ROUTING Checking policy Internal for request Setup CRV=22781 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 4 RasTbl.cxx(1416) Alias match for EP 69.91.223.144:1720 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 5 Routing.cxx(207) ROUTING Policy Internal applied to the request Setup CRV=22781 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 4 ProxyChannel.cxx(1948) Q931s Unregistered party is NATed. Not supported by policy. 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 2 RasTbl.cxx(2656) CallTable::Insert(CALL) Call No. 458, total sessions : 13 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 2 gkacct.cxx(1028) GKACCT Successfully logged event 1 for call no. 458 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 2 RasTbl.cxx(3063) CDR ignore not connected call 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 5 gkacct.cxx(806) GKACCT FileAcct - CDR string for event 2, call no. 458: CDR|458|02 2c 82 c5 4d 82 f7 15 3f 40 58 b1 96 17 04 ed|0|unconnected|Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:22:14 -0800|72.233.250.179:1220| |69.91.223.144:1720|5068_gk2|0554444:dialedDigits|DougSR:h323_ID=2981232:dialedDigits|wa-k20-gk2; 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 3 gkacct.cxx(988) GKACCT FileAcct logged event 2 for call no. 458 2009/01/15 15:22:14.185 2 gkacct.cxx(1028) GKACCT Successfully logged event 2 for call no. 458 2009/01/15 15:22:14.186 4 ProxyChannel.cxx(842) Q931 Send to 72.233.250.179:1220 I have the following settings on my GK: ;############################################################################ ;# K20 Gatekeeper 2 configuration ;############################################################################ [Gatekeeper::Main] Fourtytwo=42 Name=wa-k20-gk2 TimeToLive=60 ;Home=216.186.94.5 StatusPort=7000 EndpointIDSuffix=_gk2 [RoutedMode] GKRouted=1 H245Routed=0 CallSignalPort=1720 AcceptUnregisteredCalls=1 AcceptNeighborsCalls=1 RemoveH245AddressOnTunneling=1 DropCallsByReleaseComplete=1 SendReleaseCompleteOnDRQ=1 [RasSrv::LRQFeatures] AcceptForwardedLRQ=1 [RasSrv::Neighbors] CWU=GnuGK SeaGK=GnuGK [Neighbor::CWU] GatekeeperIdentifier=CWU Host=72.233.250.179 SendPrefixes=298,0011479298 AcceptPrefixes=* [RasSrv::LRQFeatures] AlwaysForwardLRQ=1 IncludeDestinationInfoInLCF=1 CiscoGKCompatible=1 ForwardHopCount=10 [RasSrv::RRQFeatures] AliasTypeFilter=gateway;h323id [RasSrv::ARQFeatures] ;Allows dialing the IP of an unregisterd endpoint CallUnregisteredEndpoints=1 RoundRobinGateways=1 [Gatekeeper::Auth] ;use the PrefixAuth rules below to authorize all ARQs and LRQs. PrefixAuth=required;ARQ,LRQ default=allow [PrefixAuth] ALL=allow ipv4:ALL Any ideas on what parameters I'm missing that would lead it to reject the call based on the unregistered party being NAT'ed? Thanks, -Jeremy Jeremy Wu Network Engineer, Customer Services UW Technology Services University of Washington Box 355675 Seattle, WA 98105-5675 (Tel) 206-543-1981 (Fax) 206-685-7755 -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Wu Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 10:18 AM To: 'openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: No Longer Accepting Calls from Neighbor GK on 2.2.7 So I tried using the following syntax: [RasSrv::LRQFeatures] AcceptForwardedLRQ=1 [RasSrv::Neighbors] CWU=GnuGK [Neighbor::CWU] GatekeeperIdentifier=CWU Host=72.233.250.179 SendPrefixes=298,0011479298 AcceptPrefixes=* And a call from the CWU gatekeeper (GK_C) to mine is still following the pattern where the setup message is received from GK_C, and my gatekeeper (GK_B) is sending back a ReleaseComplete. Any other ideas? Thanks, -Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Wu Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:58 AM To: 'openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: Openh323gk-users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 4 Thanks Michal, I was looking at that. My one question was in the [RasSrv::Neighbors] section, there are only 4 options for types of gatekeeper (GnuGK, CiscoGK, ClarentGK, GlonetGK). Do I just use GnuGK to identify Polycom neighbor gatekeepers as shown in your example? Thanks, -Jeremy ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:59:23 +0100 From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: No Longer Accepting Calls from Neighbor GK on2.2.7 To: "GNU Gatekeeper Users" <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <F99113EBC934431BB9BF014E0C33DD2E@treasure> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Please check the new syntax for neighbor configuration - it should look like: [RasSrv::Neighbors] GK_C=GnuGk [Neighbor::GK_C] Host=72.233.250.179 AcceptPrefixes=298,0011479298 ... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Wu" <doctorwu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 2:09 AM Subject: No Longer Accepting Calls from Neighbor GK on2.2.7 > I'm wondering if someone can help me figure out what I'm missing. I've been running an GnuGK on 2.2.2 for many years, and have > recently implemented a secondary GnuGK on 2.2.7. > > I've used pretty much the same config file for both GK. However, I am currently unable to receive calls from neighbored GKs on > the gatekeeper running 2.2.7. So if my GK_A is my 2.2.2 gatekeeper, and GK_B is my 2.2.7 gatekeeper, I have a colleague running a > GK_C that is a Polycom Path Navigator. GK_C is neighbored to both GK_A and GK_B with different prefixes. > > Using Wireshark I can see that calls from GK_C to GK_A process fine. But on calls from GK_C to GK_B, the 2.2.7 gatekeeper replies > to his Setup message with a ReleaseComplete. I can make calls between endpoints registered on GK_B fine, and I can actually call > from an endpoint on GK_B to GK_C successfully. I can also make calls between GK_A and GK_B successfully. > > I believe that I have the basic peering configurations set appropriately. > > [RoutedMode] > AcceptNeighborsCalls=1 > > [RasSrv::Neighbors] > GK_C=72.233.250.179;298,0011479298 > > And the fact that this same configuration works on my GnuGK running 2.2.2 confuses me. Am I missing a new parameter that was > introduced in later revs? > > Thanks, > -Jeremy > > Jeremy Wu > Network Engineer, Customer Services > UW Technology Services > University of Washington > Box 355675 > Seattle, WA 98105-5675 > (Tel) 206-543-1981 (Fax) 206-685-7755 ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Openh323gk-users mailing list Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users End of Openh323gk-users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 4 *********************************************** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
