Hi, the more I think about it, I would consider the behavior in regard to the priority setting for dynamically registered prefixes a bug. I've changed the behavior for 2.2.8, so they will get the gateway priority. For the prefixes themselves, I'd like to stick with the fact that on a non-permanent endpoint only the settings in [EP::...] and from the RRQ apply (and not from [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints]). Regards, Jan Jan Willamowius wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure there is a bug: > > It looks like you are using the [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints] section to > assign a prefix to a prefix to an endpoint that registers dynamically. > You should use GatewayPrefixes= in the [EP::...] section to do that, > because the permanent registration (which happens at gatekeeper start > up) will be overwritten by the dynamic registration that happens later. > > My guess is that your gateway also registers the prefixes 11,16,83412 > in its RRQ. Am I right ? > Those currently get the global default priority (which is 1) and not the > gateway default priority (which would be 2 in your case). The gateway > priority is only applied to the prefixes that are _added_ using > GatewayPrefixes=. Your dynamically set prefixes overwrite the setting in > the config. > > This is the way it always was, but I would agree that this is confusing > and dynamically registered prefixes should probably be assigned the > gateway priority. > > A quick fix would be to change the config of the gateway that it either > doesn't actively register and use it as a permanent endpoint or at > least make sure it doesn't register any prefixes and set them using > GatewayPrefixes=. > > Regards, > Jan > > > Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > > Hello! > > > > There is problem with EP config- with 2.2.6 I had problem - although > > gateway has priority 2 and there are free capacity on gateway > > with priority 1 calls are go to gateway with priority 2. > > > > I decided that 2.2.6 doesn't read config correctly. > > > > I installed 2.2.7 to find is it 2.2.6 problem or not. > > And I found that priority works only with permanent endponts. > > If I write > > > > [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints] > > 192.168.46.40=hohr;11,16,83412 > > > > [EP::p98] > > Capacity=30 > > GatewayPriority=1 > > > > [EP::hohr] > > Capacity=30 > > GatewayPriority=2 > > > > Then I get: > > > > RCF|192.168.46.40:1720|hohr:h323_ID|gateway|7851_p98 > > Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:14:37 +0500 (permanent) C(0/1/1) <1> > > Prefixes: 11:=2,16:=2,83412:=2 > > > > > > If there is no > > [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints] > > 192.168.46.40=hohr;11,16,83412 > > > > and, what is more important, after gateway registration it lost prefixes! > > > > RCF|192.168.46.40:1720|hohr:h323_ID|gateway|7851_p98 > > Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:15:51 +0500 (permanent) C(0/1/1) <1> > > Prefixes: <none> > > > > > > and gateway register itself > > I get > > > > RCF|192.168.46.40:1720|hohr:h323_ID|gateway|7851_p98 > > Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:14:37 +0500 (permanent) C(0/1/1) <1> > > Prefixes: 11:=1,16:=1,83412:=1 > > > > > > Looks like bug... -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
