It should be fixed. The patch is in the HEAD CVS branch (the main branch). I assume you are talking about the E164 prefix problem. Regarding core dumps - you don't need to send the whole core dump, just extract a stack backtrace information from it (using gdb) and send it to the list or directly to me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "JiÅà GubÃk" <jgubik@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 9:50 AM Hi, I tried to download code from CVS, compile and test it. The problem is not solved. How can I download this particular patch from CVS? Or is patch already included in main CVS tree? Will any debug help you? Please where to send core dumps? I do not want bother all list. Regards Jiri Zygmuntowicz Michal napsal(a): >It's been quite a long time, but finally I've got time >to check it and the gatekeeper incorrectly handles >aliases of type partyNumber (e164Number or privateNumber). >I prepared a fix in the cvs. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jirà GubÃk" <jgubik@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 5:54 PM > > > > >>I am new in list. I am using GNUGK two years without any problems and I >>did not need any help from list till now. >>I am facing strange problem after firmware upgrade of our HW. >>Here is ACF after upgrade: >> >>ACF|10.172.9.241:1720|3016_endp|1195|04244112416:dialedDigits=E164:05244112416:partyNumber|No_Caller_ID:h323_ID=E164:312500064:partyNumber|false; >>ACF|10.172.9.241:1720|3016_endp|1196|E164:05244112416:partyNumber|No_Caller_ID:h323_ID=E164:312500064:partyNumber|true; >> >>Device did not send E164 number before upgrade and everything worked fine. >>I am facing following problems now. >>1. E164 number has not changed prefix as dialedDigits as shown in ACF >>([RasSrv::RewriteE164] is set 05=04 ). In GK reply (second ACF) is only >>E164 and not dialedDigits. Why? >>2. The call is not connected in case that call is routed to neighbor or >>child(parent) GK. Call is connected to device registered to same GK as >>this device only. >>3. Caller ID from device with dialedDigits field only (no E164) is not >>transfered. >> >>Is there any solution? Is it GK problem or buggy H323 implementation of >>device? >>Thank for reply. >> >>Regards >>Jiri ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id…49 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
