Actually, I have run into this problem before on 2.2b5. It hasn't happen to me yet on 2.2.2. When this happens nothing is responsive. When you check the cpu usage for the Gnugk process it stays at zero, and the calls begin to drop while all incoming calls never get connected. Also this has happen to me with about 500 calls in h225 routed mode (with tunneling) only. I usually run 3 to 4 times more calls on Gnugk per server. So I don't think it's a socket issue or a cpu issue since cpu usage in routed mode its relatively low when I'm running 1500 to 2000 calls on my servers I'm at about 24 percent. I believe I posted this same problem a few months back. This issue doesn't happen very often. I once noticed that it did happen to me when I issued a debug trace on the status port, the system became non-responsive like the symptoms just described. Freddy -----Original Message----- From: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zygmuntowicz Michal Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:25 AM To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Non-Responsive Maybe you're running out of sockets or cpu usage is too high. Check port ranges and current socket usage and per process socket limits (netstat, ulimit). If you're using acct/auth, make sure your backend is not a bottleneck. ----- Original Message ----- From: "R. Todd Wallace" <rwallace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 5:01 PM > We are having issues with the GNU becoming non-responsive. The service is > still active, but you can't go to the status ports and calls start > declining. Nothing is written to the gatkeeper.log file. If you stop the > service, it will not die and you have to kill with a "-9". We have the > GNU's compiled with debug, but a core is not generated. We are running > the > latest CVS and doing full media. This seems to come with a very heavy > load > / call charge rate. The only thing I see is that it scrolls the following > message across the screen to a call sticks: > > 2005/02/07 23:19:03.299 3 ProxyChannel.cxx(2757) RTCP > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx socket has no destination address yet, flush ignored > > I think this is normal, but not sure if we are having problems with > sockets > not freeing up or not freeing fast enough. > > Any Thoughts?? > > R. Todd Wallace ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&opÌk _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
