hi Michal, thx for the quick reply, maybe this is a way to do but to change the default RAS/signalling ports isn´t possible because of the broad range of subscribers yet but even if it´s possible i wouldn´t like to change the defaults because of some broken NAT Routers. i am really far a way a so called developer but i guess there must be an other way to handle brain dead routers and endpoints. thx and cu TOM /quote/ From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx> To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: how to improve intelligent nat handling Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:52:40 +0100 Organization: Quarcom Reply-To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx You're right, there are a few routes that mess up with the signalling (Planet ones) and do not rewrite everything correctly or do even some more strange things. One possible solution (if you cannot reconfigure the router) is to change default RAS/signalling ports for the gatekeeper, so the router does not notice RAS/signaling messages and will not have a chance to change it. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
