On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:44:34 +0200 "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx> wrote: > That's correct. But the recent posts show that gnugk > socket implementation outperforms the one from pwlib > in terms of cpu usage. Of course, the problem may be > not in pwlib but in the way gnugk is using sockets. > Another thing is that gnugk implementation is rather > a minimalistic one;) I've no doubt that the GnuGk-specific code could be more efficient for GnuGk than the code in PWLib. > I've also found a way to improve gnugk socket code > performance (for both pwlib and gnugk sockets), > so maybe the results will be much better. Will you be sharing this with other people? Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren, craigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.postincrement.com Post Increment - Software, Consulting and Services Co-founder of the only open source H.323 project Phone: +61 2 43654666 Fax: +61 2 43673140 Mobile: +61 417 231046 ICQ: #86852844 MSN: craig_southeren@xxxxxxxxxxx GnuPG Public Key: http://www.postincrement.com/pgp.txt Blog: http://www.southeren.com/blog/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
