Re: Simple Call Authentication/Authorization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What does 'rv' command at the parent gk tell about the child gk?
Maybe the child gk is not registered at all with the parent?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Croch" <o_engenheiro71@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:51 PM


> Michal, the following is the trace that I get from the parent GK. It is very 
> weird. I get from the parent GK a security denial
> ARJ|192.168.0.144:1721|yyyyyyyyyy:dialedDigits|60013:dialedDigits|false|securit
> yDenial;
> 
> In the parent GK I had the following config
> 
> [Gatekeeper::Auth]
> PrefixAuth=required;ARQ
> 
> [PrefixAuth]
> ALL=allow alias:60013
> 
> TRACE FROM THE PARENT GK
> 
> 2004/03/12 12:45:06.500 1             RasSrv.cxx(1321)  GK      ARQ Received
> 2004/03/12 12:45:06.516 2             RasSrv.cxx(1602)  ARJ| 
> |yyyyyyyyy:dialed
> Digits|60013:dialedDigits|false|callerNotRegistered;
> 
> 2004/03/12 12:45:06.531 3             RasSrv.cxx(2164)  GK      Send to 
> y.y.y.y:1719
> admissionReject {
>     requestSeqNum = 7
>     rejectReason = callerNotRegistered <<null>>
>   }
> 2004/03/12 12:45:06.984 2             RasSrv.cxx(2224)  GK      Read from 
> y.y.y.y:1719
> 
> 
> 
> >From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <zvision@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Fw:  Simple Call Authentication/Authorization
> >Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:02:31 +0100
> >
> >Maybe you need to look at the parent gk log?
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Andrew Croch" <o_engenheiro71@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:25 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > > posting again...
> > > > >
> > > > >Michal, thank you for your response. You're right, now it worked fine 
> >for
> > > > >almost all the scenarios that I have been testing. However, It 
> >doesn't work
> > > > >in a scenario where I have a terminal registering with a Child GK.
> > > > >I have been using this setup without a problem before adding this 
> >call
> > > > >authentication feature. I mean, I have a terminal connected to a 
> >child gk
> > > > >to go through NAT and it works beautifully.
> > > > >When I added this alias authentication I can not make this setup 
> >work.
> > > > >The terminal is able to register with the child GK but the parent GK
> > > > >rejects the call for securitydenial reason. The alias is comming 
> >correct
> > > > >from the child to the parent, the ARQ that the parent gets from the 
> >child
> > > > >seems to be ok, with the correct alias, but I always get a security 
> >denial.
> > > > >It seems that I need to change something in the parent GK to allow 
> >the
> > > > >child to call. Do I need to change something in the parent GK 
> >configuration
> > > > >to allow the child to call ?
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux