Re[7]: [RasSrv::GWRewriteE164] question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thursday, February 12, 2004, 5:53:56 PM, Ian wrote:

ICbxc> If its going to be something thats wanted I'll have a look at implementing
ICbxc> it for LRQ messages. I don't think it should be too difficult, I'm a little
ICbxc> short of GKs for testing it though.

ICbxc> Ian

I think it would be a great feature. I would be glad to have it :)

Regards,
        Thomas

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zygmuntowicz Michal [mailto:m.zygmuntowicz@onet.pl]
>> Sent: 12 February 2004 14:07
>> To: openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: Re[5]:  
>> [RasSrv::GWRewriteE164] question
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry, I didn't notice that you use GWRewriteE164, not RewriteE164...
>> So you're probably right that LRQs are not yet supported by 
>> this rewrite
>> mechanism
>> 
>> Thomas <thomasj@eworld.hu> wrote:
>> >Thursday, February 12, 2004, 12:27:42 PM, Thomas wrote:
>> >
>> >T> Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:46:39 AM, Zygmuntowicz wrote:
>> >
>> >ZM>> The rewrite should work for any calls (LRQ,ARQ,Setup).
>> >T> Oh, good! So [RasSrv::GWRewriteE164] is planned also for LRQ, just
>> >T> doesn\'t implemented yet? (according to Norguhtar\'s answer).
>> >T> I will try it and will see how is it in practice :)
>> >
>> >Well, I tryed this. Unfortunately it didn\'t work.
>> >What I tryed:
>> >
>> >[Neighbor::myGK]
>> >Host=<n1GKIP>
>> >Dynamic=0
>> >SendPrefixes=
>> >AcceptPrefixes=*
>> >
>> >[RasSrv::Neighbors]
>> >n1GK=CiscoGK
>> >
>> >[RasSrv::GWRewriteE164]
>> >n1GK=in=331=123#331
>> >
>> >When a call came from n1GK, I got LRJ. From log:
>> >2004/02/12 14:31:22.921 5              Routing.h(117)   
>> ROUTING Checking policy Internal for the request LRQ 151
>> >2004/02/12 14:31:22.921 5              Routing.h(117)   
>> ROUTING Checking policy Neighbor for the request LRQ 151
>> >2004/02/12 14:31:22.921 2             RasSrv.cxx(347)   
>> LRJ|<n1GKIP>|33123:dialedDigits|n1GK|requestDenied;
>> >So the number wasn\'t rewritten by n1GK=in=331=123#331 rule.
>> >
>> >Thanks in advance,
>> >        Thomas
>> >
>> >ps: whenever I put into 331=123#331 [RasSrv::RewriteE164] 
>> section I get LCF.
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
>> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
>> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
>> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>> 




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux