When u will include in 2.2 beta ,i need it in extreme emergency Regards, ________________ Engr. Rafat Subhan Software Developer Advanced Communications House no 423 F-11/3 Islamabad mail: rafat@advcomm.net MSN: qudrat2210@hotmail.com Cell : +92-300-5195822 http://www.advcomm.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Willamowius" <jan@willamowius.de> To: <openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: <Ian.Campbell@band-x.com> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 4:39 PM Subject: Re: Re: Re: Rewriting E164 numbers after GW selection > Hi, > > I had a chance to talk to Michal in person on the OpenSource Telephony > Summit and we decided that we want to be strict on the feature freeze > for the 2.0.x branch. We must get 2.2 out and all new 2.0 features stand > in the way of that. > > I would suggest implementing this rewriting into 2.2 now, and then do a > backport to 2.0 after it has been proven stable in 2.2. > > Regards, > Jan > > Ian.Campbell@band-x.com wrote: > > Hello All, > > I have finally got round to implementing per gateway E164 number > > rewriting as discussed in this thread in early November. Attached is a > > patch providing it for version 2.0.6. The code provides triple stage > > rewriting: > > > > per gw input E164 rewriting -> standard E164 rewriting -> (endpoint > > selection) -> per gw output E164 rewriting > > > > This is configured in a new configuration section as follows: > > > > [RasSrv::GWRewriteE164] > > foo=out=1223=2323 > > foo=out=13=4444 > > foo=in=777=8888 > > bar=in=777=9999 > > > > And so on. The first element in the line is the GW that the rule is > > being applied to the second the direction (whether it is applied > > before the standard rewriting and the endpoint selection or after) and > > finally the rule itself in the same as the standard rewriting > > ([RasSrv::RewriteE164]). All this allows much more sophisticated > > control of what is sent to the endpoint for example an authentication > > prefix and per endpoint routing policies to be constructed. The code > > has been tested by me, but should probably be considered alpha quality > > for now. > > > > Jan et al. is there anything I need to do (beyond applying this to the > > 2.2 CVS archive) to get this included in a future release? > > > > Regards, > > > > Ian Campbell > > Band-X Ltd. > > -- > Jan Willamowius, jan@willamowius.de, http://www.willamowius.de/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
