Re: Windows, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris - what is better for GNUGK?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 30 December 2003 20:04, Vitaliy Yurchenko wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> You are right with estimations.
>
> I'm looking for an indication of having GNUGK in carrier grade
> production environment. But I'm not looking for
> putting 300-500 call setups per second to a single GK :)
> It could be nice :), but... not realistic.
>

ths highest i have heard in production from my associates is DS3 worth of 
traffic. agian this depends on mysql writes, radius auth and acct, etc.
again much of this has to consider bulk call attempts, busy hour  traffic and 
other paterns. since no single route would handle that much termination, i 
would suggest you do what i have done which is assign GK to individual 
terminations and let orig gws select routes they purchase and point to 
appropriate gk.

regards
ray



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux