Re: Windows, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris - what is better for GNUGK?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> 3. Do any body using GNUGK for carrier grade traffic (~10M minutes a day)?
>

i run production traffic but nothing close to this level.
based on your estimates i assume the followint..

300M mins per month would require 600 to 1000 E1s of termination capacity 
which would be 18000 to 30000 individual DS0s

you would need the same amount of origination GWs registered with the system.

with a healthy 50% ASR for termination i assume you have to double the above 
amount of call attempts. so you would need to process maybe 600 million 
calls.

i am not the most qualified to answer this but i could not imagine runing this 
amount of traffic on 1 machine.

regards
ray



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux