Re: Endpoints calling "remote" gatekeepers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



rtfm
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex A" <hades_d@hotmail.com>
To: <openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:19 PM
Subject:  Endpoints calling "remote" gatekeepers


>
>   Abstract: I would like to be able to place calls to users using
> gatekeepers not configured in my gatekeeper.
>
>
>   I have not read all there is about gatekeepers, and I have not read all
> there is about this particular one. But I have read about features and
> configuration and there is one thing that I find lacking.
>
>   If I understand the documentation correctly: you have to have all
> gatekeepers, to which users you want to call, configured in the gatekeeper
> you are registered to and hence trying to use as a means to place call
with.
> This I find to be restricting the possibility to use internet as a means
to
> verbally communicate with other people. If you want to place calls to
people
> in different locations, using their own gatekeeper, you would have to
> configure you gatekeeper to find users on all other gatekeepers. This
rules
> out all possibility to, for example, give someone your "voice address" and
> say "Call me!", unlike e-mail with which you can spread around to let
anyone
> easily send messages to you. This is (to me) a really annoying limitation,
> since the solution could be very simple.
>
>   Why not just allow users to specify a target gatekeeper along with the
> username? The gatekeeper name would preferably just be a hostname, telling
> the gatekeeper to look for a another gatekeeper at that address and make
> arrangement to place a call to the user. A feature like that, I believe,
> would be tremendously useful. And all it requires from the gatekeeper is
to
> try to connect to a gatekeeper at a given address, ask if the user exist
and
> "patch him through".
>
>   Imagine companies putting out their telephone support number as
> "support@voice.cisco.com". Anyone from anywhere around the world (with an
> internet connection) would be able to call without paying anything more
than
> their internet connection.
>
>   If a system like this would work, I see no reason not to be able to
throw
> the old phones out the window within a few years.
>
>
>
> I hope haven't misunderstood the workings of gatekeepers completely, I
there
> already are a solution to this, I would appreciate if someone could
explain
> it to me.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux