----- Original Message ----- From: "Nir Simionovich" <nirs@m-wise.com> To: <openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Interesting interoperability with Quintum of gnugk. > Hi All, > > From my past experience (be it only 6 months of so) with Quintum > boxes, I can only say one major thing about those boxes: THEY SUCK ! Come on! Don't be so extreme. There are thousands of Quintum boxes serving very well to their owners. > > Although the inter-op with GnuGK easily when configured as endpoints, > they tend to never inter-op with anything else on the other side. The > Codec compatibality on those boxes is horrible, when a call terminates, > getting a normal DC cause is a miracle, not to talk about the fact that > it usually takes abour 4 setup cycles for an H323 session to start, > resulting in extremly long PDD's. > > Now, I've worked with various equipments, varying from Vendors to Open > Source products, and all I can say is this: If you think of buying a > Quintum, don't let the price tempt you, it's not worth it. I've been > trying to understand the issues with Quintum, but when every DC comes > back with an "unspecified error", it's very hard. > Maybe here you are right, however the "event logger" (the debug sub-system of Quintum) is IMHO very usefull (specially on CMS). For me personally, it has helped me a lot to see and solve very stupid problems at the other side. Run the debug (it can go in realtime on your screen) on CMS. It will definitely point you to the source of the error. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
