Hi Dirk, dirk los wrote: > I saw that it is possible to implement CTI functionality in the ARQ > phase. > Further I read in a very nice historical overview of Chih-Wei Huang > that > there is a contribution from Olivier Grall with TransferCall > functionality. Where can I find more about this? Try the manual: Virtual queues and TransferCall are available in the regular releases via the status port. > What is the vision on future development about CTI? > Are there plans for implementation of H.450.x ? > I can imagine that this might be a straight forward way to get control > of the call in other states. It requires an extra H.450 module that > independently can handle H.450 requests in interaction with commands > at the status port. A lot of tough call handling work is done already > in H.450 enabled endpoints. Is there some development to be expected > in this direction? Right now nobody is working on H.450 as far as I know. Most (all ?) H.450 procedures need support by the endpoint and from what I hear that is still pretty hard to find. Some endpoint initiated H.450 procedure work with GnuGk, because the gatekeeper doesn't have an active role in them. But I don't have an overview what does and what doesn't. Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, jan@willamowius.de, http://www.willamowius.de/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
