> You should not setup GK2 as your neighbor. The config entry: > > [RasSrv::Neighbors] > GK2=GK2_IP_ADDRESS > > is just present to signal that calls incoming from this GK to your GK > should be classified as "neighbor calls". ok understood, thanks. Important note is that you should > not define here anything more to the IP address (no prefix,...), because > you do not want to send LRQ messages GK2. GK2 is configured as a permament > endpoint and has a prefix assigned in other config sections. yes, if GK2 is the termination point, i have assigned it and its prefixes under permanent endpoint section. i noticed in an earlier post and not related to this thread, the topic of dial prefixes. i too have seen this used as a means to seperate calls that come from one origination point from another and from calls that terminate to one carrier or another. i do this using the prefixes section and find it quite powerful. if i have an origination carrier, i have him pad his dial string with lets say 111. if i have termination routes, i may pad one with 999. then if i want carrier who originates with 111 to use only route lets say 11101152 i just do a rewrite from his incomming padded digits to the carrier with 999. its like a manual routing scheme. i dont know why anything much more would be needed unless im misssing something. best regards ray > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ray Jackman" <ray@havenet.com> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:21 PM > > > first i would like to thank michal and others for your detailed and thoughtful response. > > > > i now understand the problem in detail. i have tried the below configuration but i will have to > > make changes to the GK2 (not mine) as when i set it up he configured me as an endpoint or > > GW and when i put him in as a neighbor he is not accepting my LRQ request it seems. in > > logging it indicates cannot find destination. i did make the config file exactly as you > > suggested, i added the dial prefixes (555) for which i pad the front of teh call that i send to > > him. this is what i had when i include him as perm endpoing and routing works fine. in my > > last test GK1 originates call as neighbor, i recieve call and attempt to route to peremant > > endpoint defined in gnugk. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ -- Heritage Communications Corporation Melbourne, FL USA 32935 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
