Test scenarion: GK------------------NAT/Firewall----<Public network> 192.168.3.x 192.168.3.x/public IP Is it possible to force gnu gk to replace its 192.168.3.x address inside RAS/signalling messages with preconfigured IP address of NAT/Firewall. NAT/Firewall contains identity (1:1) forwarding of approtiate ports (1719,1720,1721,RTP range) to GK machine. In order to make GK working fine with this scenario it is required to replace all IP addresses inside RAS/signalling messages, am I correct? NAT/Firewall is not H.323 aware. Is it implemented in gnu gk/sheduled to be implemented/will not be implemented ever? --- Zygmuntowicz Michal ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com. Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the best hiring companies. http://www.dice.com/index.epl?rel_code=104 _______________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@lists.sourceforge.net Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
