On 09/05/2014 12:07 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > After reading in a previous post that Classpath was not being > "actively developed" anymore, I said that it would be a pity to let > the project die, and suggested that perhaps it was time to look for an > adopter (http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2014-August/003270.html) That was perhaps my fault; I said it was not being actively developed, when I should have said it was not much being actively developed. That's a subtle distinction, but one that matters to some people. Andrew.
