Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:10:57 +0100
Cc: classpath <classpath@xxxxxxx>, java <java@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <17c6771e0811081624h23798520sa6df8cf4ee06e696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <K9YMPL$EE8A6F8D456C503AD6F47FAE27B666E7@xxxxxxxxx> <49148F35.8030209@xxxxxxxxxx> <49157A8C.5090200@xxxxxxxxxx> <49158A38.70806@xxxxxxxxxx> <17c6771e0811081624h23798520sa6df8cf4ee06e696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Andrew,

On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 00:24 +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> So is the bug GCJ only? I got the impression we were also seeing this
> on Classpath.

I cannot replicate it with jamvm/classpath, so I assume it is gcj only.
The erroneous gdk_threads_leave () line is also not in the classpath CVS
sources.

Cheers,

Mark

References:
- Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
  - From: ffileppo
- Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
  - From: Andrew John Hughes

Prev by Date: Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
Next by Date: Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
Previous by thread: Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
Next by thread: Re: [GCJ] Performance of GUI applications on embedded systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development]

Powered by Linux