Re: GCJ Mauve testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: GCJ Mauve testing
From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:16:29 +0100
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx>, classpath@xxxxxxx, java@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <17c6771e0810181612t5e0984a0p72b6860e5f8128d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080926230521.GC10172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F9E6A2.6050304@xxxxxxxxxx> <17c6771e0810181612t5e0984a0p72b6860e5f8128d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914)

Andrew John Hughes wrote:

> What is the plan for merging to trunk?

If we're sure it fixes bugs and doesn't introduce new ones,
once it's stable we can merge.  We're close, I think.

Andrew.

References:
- GCJ Mauve testing
  - From: Andrew John Hughes
- Re: GCJ Mauve testing
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: GCJ Mauve testing
  - From: Andrew John Hughes

Prev by Date: Re: GCJ Mauve testing
Next by Date: Re: GTK+ peers on DirectFB (instead of Xorg)
Previous by thread: Re: GCJ Mauve testing
Next by thread: Disabled wiki editing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Cryptography] [Fedora] [Fedora Directory] [Red Hat Development]

Powered by Linux