Hi Dalibor, On 3/19/08, Dalibor Topic <robilad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Trevor Harmon wrote: > > Okay this is something that has confused me. classpath seems to have a > > dependency on jamvm, but jamvm seems to have a dependency on > > classpath. How is this not circular? > You can pass in a prebuilt glibj.zip to configure, without having to > mess around with ecj on your target platform. > > You can also use Sun's javac, or gcj + ecj, or IKVM, or Cacao, or Kaffe > up to 1.1.7, which came with it's own copy of gnu classpath, and so on. > Yes, there's a huge number of options. I wasn't advocating using JamVM, just giving an example of what I do :) Thanks, Rob. > There is no lack of options for bootstrapping a classpath build, if > that's what you really need to do, rather that making sure your > distribution ships the latest one, and using that instead. :) > > cheers, > dalibor topic > >
