Re: Swing & AWT demo troubles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I filed 3 separate bugs for the issues I mentioned below.

Regards
Robert

Roman Kennke schrieb:
> Hi Robert,
> 
>> actually I wanted to test an XML patch on an application but while
>> running an IzPack created installer with a Cacao+Classpath CVS HEAD
>> I saw a lot of layout/drawing errors.
>>
>> Running the AWT demo resulted in:
>> cacao -cp examples.zip gnu/classpath/examples/awt/Demo
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException
>>    at java.lang.Class.asSubclass(Class.java:1304)
>>    at
>> gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit.createDragGestureRecognizer(GtkToolkit.java:637)
>>    at
>> java.awt.dnd.DragSource.createDragGestureRecognizer(DragSource.java:235)
>>    at
>> java.awt.dnd.DragSource.createDefaultDragGestureRecognizer(DragSource.java:244)
>>    at
>> gnu.classpath.examples.awt.Demo$DragDropWindow$DragLabel.<init>(Demo.java:946)
>>    at gnu.classpath.examples.awt.Demo$DragDropWindow.<init>(Demo.java:867)
>>    at gnu.classpath.examples.awt.Demo$MainWindow.<init>(Demo.java:218)
>>    at gnu.classpath.examples.awt.Demo.main(Demo.java:92)
>>
>> And the TextAreaDemo produces:
>>
>> cacao -cp examples.zip gnu/classpath/examples/swing/TextAreaDemo
>> Exception during event dispatch:
>> java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
>>    at javax.swing.text.PlainView.paint(PlainView.java:298)
>>    at
>> javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTextUI$RootView.paint(BasicTextUI.java:388)
>>    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTextUI.paintSafely(BasicTextUI.java:1154)
>>    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTextUI.paint(BasicTextUI.java:1105)
>>    at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTextUI.update(BasicTextUI.java:1183)
>>
>> Has anyone a quick idea or should I post bug reports for both issues?
> 
> Probably all of them (or at least most of them) could have been induced
> by my patches. Unfortunately I'm very busy with my thesis thingy right
> now and can fix them as fast as usual. I'll really try hard to have a
> look and do something about them before the release. It would indeed be
> useful if you'd file bug reports and flag them as blocker or so. Would
> look pretty bad if we ship half-broken demos.
> 
> /Roman
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux