Andrew Haley wrote: > Jeroen Frijters writes: > > Tom Tromey wrote: > > > As I recall things in gnu.classpath should not be available > > > to application code. The system class loader, or something, > > > has to enforce this. > > > > That's correct. The (default) system class loader calls > > SecurityManager.checkPackageAccess() in loadClass(String,boolean). > > > > > I'm having some trouble with the details but I know Jeroen > > > knows the details here... > > > > I don't remember the details of the rest of the story, but > > earlier in this thread Casey posted a (very small) patch that > > enables this infrastructure and protects the gnu.classpath. > > package. > > I'm sure we don't do the right thing in gcj. This test case > (apprended) should do: > > Checking class [Lxxx.ttt; > checkPackageAccess sun.reflect.misc > checkPackageAccess sun.reflect.misc > checkPackageAccess xxx > > but on gcj does: > > Checking class [Lxxx.ttt; > checkPackageAccess xxx IIRC several of the relevant classes for this depend on VMStackWalker and as such are somewhat out of date in gcj. Cheers, Gary
