Hi all, hi Casey. As discussed earlier I am investigating the removal of the above class. In contrast to what I said in another mail I found two uses of the VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl. In PlainDatagramSocketImpl the IP_TTL field is used. This can be fixed by moving the constant into e.g VMPlainSocketImpl or VMChannel. When doing so the constant's name should be changed to something like CP_IP_TTL because it would otherwise conflict with a constant in the system headers when using the class in GCJ. Still there is something to find out: The IP_TTL constant is used for the VMPlainSocketImpl.setOption method. The JNI code for that method contains a big switch statement, but there is no case for IP_TTL. Should it simply be added? The other thing that is used from VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl is the connect() method. Is it possible for DGRAM sockets to just use VMChannel.connect instead? cya Robert
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
