Re: BigDecimal mauve regressions (FYI: patch)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 16:54 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:

> Did you also happen to look at the DiagBigDecimal test? It passed with
> 0.91, but current CVS (with or without you patch) gives the following
> failures:
..[snip list of 22 failures]..

Yes. I didn't investigate those further because the 1.5 JRE fails
the same set of tests (+4 more). The 1.4 JRE fails only 3 of them.

So these tests need a bit of looking into, but I'm pretty sure
that like the construct() failure, it's due to the change in toString()
behaviour, and not any real bugs.

/Sven



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux