Robert Lougher wrote: > > Thanks for the positive feedback! My tests show that JamVM should now > need less heap (in some cases much less memory, i.e. 3x less). In > particular, JamVM should now be able to run some applications which > used to run out of memory (e.g. gjdoc). I'd be really interested to > hear if some people are now able to do things which they previously > couldn't. > > Thanks, > > Rob. > Hi Rob, I was hoping to have a bug report to go along with my positive feedback, but you'll have to make do with the positive feedback only! Previously I was able to run StatCVS on JamVM for the Mauve CVS logfile, but not the GNU Classpath CVS logfile (which is very large, about 250MB). Now, with JamVM 1.4.3, it runs just fine - here's the latest output: http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/statcvs/ So great work, thanks! Dave
