On 2/27/06, Brian Jones <cbj@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Suggest making next release 0.90 and incrementing towards 1.0. The 1.0 > release should be 1.4.0 (or 1.40 if you were going to be consistent, but > I digress). Anyway my $0.02. 0.90 has problems if there turn out to be more than 9 more releases before 1.(4.)0 is reached. Hard to say whether that's likely or not, but I think it would be better if our decision of when to hit 1.x was based purely on technical grounds and not affected by limits on the version-number space. On the other hand, well spotted (I think?) that 0.9.x might be considered a lower version that 0.21 by packaging tools. dpkg --compare-versions appears to think so, if I'm understanding how to use it right. This may be moot though as the debian classpath package already has an epoch on it; I don't know how rpm handles this kind of issue. Stuart. -- http://sab39.dev.netreach.com/
