Hi, From: Roman Kennke <roman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:15:30 +0100 > Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Frijters: > > While I'm certainly not against this option, I would like to point out > > that for some VMs using a native library isn't really a great solution, > > so I really hope this doesn't mean that you discontinue your excellent > > (and *much* appreciated) work on gnu.regexp. > > My opinion. :-) Yes, of course. A pure Java implementaton comes first, and it should be used by default. For now, until some nice alternative appears, that is gnu.regexp. I do not see any nice alternative appearing, so I will continue to make efforts to improve gnu.regexp. JNI implementation will be for those who cannot be satisfied with the dafault. That is the way I am using java.nio.charset. I am not satisfied with the default gnu.java.nio.charset because it cannot handle Japanese charsets, so I use gnu.java.nio.charset.iconv.
