Hi, Brian Cameron wrote: > The GNOME Foot could only be licensed by the copyright holder. I'd > think any licenses assigned without permission by the copyright holder > would not be considered valid. So, how can there be images in the > wild? I'd think the copyright holder should know how it has been > licensed with permission. If, for example, the GNOME foot (which is in the wiki) were released to one person by the original author under by-sa or fdl, and then redistributed from there, we'd be SOL. If, for example, the foot's creator never did such a thing, but someone else marked the foot file as CC by-sa or fdl, and then that got shipped around, then the original author could certainly ask for correction. > Is it not The GNOME Foundation who owns the copyright to the logo? I > thought the author of the foot logo image provided the artwork as a > part of a contest. No - as far as I know, the foot is copyright jimmac. jimmac can confirm. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary GNOME Foundation member dneary@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
