Re: Why second panel is needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 29 Mar 2009, at 18:17, Александр Бежашвили wrote:
*GNOME Panel doesn’t give possibility to find necessary application  > and> don't be misled in menu lists.*>> *These 3 menu items grow up, but work with system is more and more  > harder> with them.*>> *Users don’t have easy possibility get what they want, and what  > they really> use.*>> Button of fast access to often used applications and directories  > will be> more easy-to-use.>> Common user rare add applets to second panel. And others do it only  > because> they wanted that this panel would be wanted.>> And what common user know difference Administration applications from> Preferences in System menu.
These would make good hypotheses for a usability study... but without  any data to prove them, they're really just opinions.  And everyone  has a lot of those :)
Fortunately, the guys working on the new GNOME shell are throwing away  the current panel ideas, and re-thinking the whole desktop model from  the ground up.  You might want to read:<http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell>
and join the discussion over at:<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
*Miguel de Icaza uses openSUSE with Windows-like menu.*
/me bites tongue :)
Cheeri,Calum.
-- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer       Sun Microsystems Irelandmailto:calum.benson@xxxxxxx            OpenSolaris Desktop Teamhttp://blogs.sun.com/calum             +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
_______________________________________________gnome-list mailing listgnome-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Trinity Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux