>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bahram Alinezhad" (alineziad@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: ---------- [...] You didn't notice that even "file-roller" was not as fast as expected (e.g. compared to WinRAR); Isn't it due to its dynamic resize of extraction menu (loading the cpu for doing so)? Additionally, why "file-roller" doesn't show a progress bar instead of a swapping bar? A swapping bar may be attractive, but a progress bar may be necessary, especially for long archives. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Petri Kanerva" (petri.kanerva@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: ---------- Because file-roller is just a frontend for commandline archivers, and all of those don't report the progress in any way in the middle of operation. THings being like this, it is impossible to show a progressbar, as we don't know when the operation finishes, untill it's finished. And one point about file-roller, it does a filesystem view, with folders and subfolders, of the archive, as opposed WinRAR which only lists the files all at once. This takes some processing, and if one more sec is the price to pay for the file-rollers way, I'll pay it gladly. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< No, no! WinRAR shows and of-course, extracts all paths (folder structure) inside all archives; Didn't you ever use it or I don't understand you exactly? Furthermore, if "Eugene Roshal" can make such an effective software that is not based on a command back-end, you (Gnome project) are able to do better, aren't you? Best regards, Bahram Alinezhad, Tehran, Iran. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
