On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 07:32, Telsa Gwynne wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:12:01AM -0700 or thereabouts, Donald D Henson wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 00:07, Kevin Francis wrote: > > > Back when I was subscribed last year it was really noisy, but ... it > > > appears to be dead now ... either that or I am somehow not receiving > > > mail because of procmail again. > > > > > > If anyone sees this can they just reply (to my address)? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > I got it but FWIW I had the very same question yesterday. I posted a > > problem asking for assistance and didn't get any response at all. Maybe > > all the 'helpers' have gone. > > The one about "connection to ":0:0" refused by server"? No, my question was the one about the Gnome Settings Daemon. > > Possibly no-one knew the answer. I presume from the mention of > YaST that you are using SuSE, about which I know less than > nothing. I have never seen an error message from "Gnome SuperUser" > so I suppose it is a SuSE thing. > > I delete questions I know I can't answer and will not be able > to answer. I answer questions I can answer without spending too > much time. And I leave the hard ones until the weekend in the > hope that someone else will answer; but knowing that I have > more time at the weekend to do a little research. This question > fell into that category because the "connection to :0:0" thing > does ring a bell, but not in connection with a Gnome SuperUser. > > You normally see that message when another user -- any other > user -- tries to run a command which involves drawing things > on the X server which your user owns. It doesn't normally > have Gnome SuperUser prepended, though. > > So for example, create a test user or two. Log in as one test > user. Start X (Gnome, KDE, plain old X). "su othertestuser". > Try to run any graphical app. You'll get that message. > > Beyond that, I am at a loss because I don't know SuSE and I > don't know this Gnome SuperUser thing. So that gets saved > for the weekend. Sorry about that :) > > Telsa I appreciate your response but I wasn't complaining about not getting an answer. I was just offering one possible explanation of why the list was quiet. It was not my intention to offend anyone. Don Henson _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
