Re: gluster volume rebalance making things more unbalanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Strahil

The documentation I looked at:

suggested that not using force might leave some links behind that could affect performance

Thanks

Pat


On 8/27/20 10:43 AM, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
Sadly I have no idea why rebalance did that , so you should check the logs on all nodes for clues.

Is there any reason why you used "force" in that command ?


Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov






В четвъртък, 27 август 2020 г., 17:32:24 Гринуич+3, Pat Haley <phaley@xxxxxxx> написа: 










Hi,

We have distributed gluster volume spread across 4 bricks.  Yesterday I noticed that the remaining space was uneven (about 2.7TB, 1.7TB, 1TB, 1TB) so I issued the following rebalance command

     
    * gluster volume rebalance <VOLNAME> start force
    

Today I see that instead, things have gotten even more unbalanced (64G 853G 6.2T 20K).  I'm killing the rebalance now.  What should I do to make sure that I get a successful rebalance?

Thanks

Pat
-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Pat Haley                          Email:  phaley@xxxxxxx
Center for Ocean Engineering       Phone:  (617) 253-6824
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering    Fax:    (617) 253-8125
MIT, Room 5-213                    http://web.mit.edu/phaley/www/
77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA  02139-4301
________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux