But still, have some doubt how LVM will handle in case of disk failure!
Or even mdadm.
Both need intervention when one or more disks die!
What I need is something like ZFS but that uses less resources...
Thanks any way
---
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
Em ter., 28 de jul. de 2020 às 17:16, Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes32@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
Good to know that...Thanks---Gilberto Nunes FerreiraEm ter., 28 de jul. de 2020 às 17:08, Alvin Starr <alvin@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:Having just been burnt by BTRFS I would stick with XFS and LVM/others.
LVM will do disk replication or raid1. I do not believe that raid3,4,5,6.. is supported.
mdadm does support all the various raid modes and I have used it quite reliably for years.
You may want to look at the raid456 write-journal but that will require an SSD or NVME deivce to be used effectively.
On 7/28/20 3:43 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
Hi there....
'till now, I am using glusterfs over XFS and so far so good.Using LVM too....Unfortunately, there is no way with XFS to merge two or more HDD, in order to use more than one HDD, like RAID1 or RAID5.My primary goal is to use two server with GlusterFS on top of multiples HDDs for qemu images.I have think about BTRFS or mdadm.Anybody has some experience on this?
Thanks a lot
---Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-- Alvin Starr || land: (647)478-6285 Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133 alvin@xxxxxxxxxx ||
________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
