Re: State of Gluster project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:06:33 +0300
Mahdi Adnan <mahdi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> [gluster going down ]

I am following this project for quite some years now, probably longer than
most of the people nowadays on the list. The project started with the
brilliant idea of making a fs on top of classical fs's distributed over
several hardware pieces without need to re-copy data for entering or leaving
the gluster. (I thought) it started as a proof-of-concept fs on fuse with the
intention to turn into kernel-space as soon as possible to get the performance
that it should have for a fs. 
After five years of waiting (and using) I declared the project dead for our
use (about five years ago) because it evolved more and more to bloatware. And
I do think that Red Hat understood that finally (too), and what you mentioned
is just the outcome of that.
I really hate the way this project took, because for me it was visible from
the very start that it is a dead-end. After all those years it is bloatware on
fuse. And I feel very sorry for that brilliant idea that it once was.
_FS IN USERSPACE IS SH*T_  - understand that.


-- 
Regards,
Stephan
________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux