I made the following changes for small file performance as suggested by http://blog.gluster.org/gluster-tiering-and-small-file-performance/
I am still seeing du -sh /data/shared taking 39 minutes.
Any other tuning I can do. Most of my files are 15K. Here is sample of small files with size and number of occurrences
FileSize. # of occurrence
==== ============
1.1K 1122 1.1M 1040 1.2K 1281 1.2M 1357 1.3K 1149 1.3M 1098 1.4K 1119 1.5K 1189 1.6K 1036 1.7K 1169 11K 2157 12K 2398 13K 2402 14K 2406 15K 2426 16K 2386 17K 1986 18K 2037 19K 1829 2.0K 1027 2.1K 1048 2.4K 1013 20K 1585 21K 1713 22K 1590 23K 1371 24K 1428 25K 1444 26K 1391 27K 1217 28K 1485 29K 1282 30K 1303 31K 1275 32K 1296 33K 1058 36K 1023 37K 1107 39K 1092 41K 1034 42K 1187 46K 1030
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:30 PM <vadud3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
time du -sh /data/shared 431G /data/shared real 45m49.992s user 0m20.043s sys 2m32.456sgluster fs is extremely slowAny suggestions on what settings to change to improve it?--Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users