Re: MTU 9000 question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear List,


same question and same setup from my side.


Regards,

Felix

On 06/05/2020 16:09, Erik Jacobson wrote:
It is inconvenient for us to use MTU 9K for our gluster servers for
various reasons. We typically have bonded 10G interfaces.

We use distribute/replicate and gluster NFS for compute nodes.

My understanding is the negative to using 1500 MTU is just less
efficient use of the network. Are there other concerns? We don't
currently have network saturation problems.

We are trying to make a decision on if we need to do a bunch of extra
work to switch to 9K MTU and if it is worth the benefit.

Does the community have any suggestions?

Erik
________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux