On 15/12/2018 13:46, Diego Remolina wrote: > Matt, > > Can you test the updated samba packages that the CentOS > team has built for FasTrack? > > A NOTE has been added to this issue. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > (0033351) pgreco (developer) - 2018-12-15 13:43 > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15586#c33351 ; > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > @dijuremo@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:dijuremo@xxxxxxxxx> > Here's the link for the test build > https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-fasttrack.x86_64/samba/20181214164659/4.8.3-4.el7.0.1.x86_64/ > . > Please let us know how it goes. Thanks for testing! > Pablo. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Diego > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:52 AM Anoop C S > <anoopcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:anoopcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:31 +0000, Matt Waymack wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I’m having an issue on Windows clients accessing > shares via smb when > > > using vfs_glusterfs. They are unable to create any > file or folders > > > at the root of the share and get the error “The file > is too large for > > > the destination file system.” When I change from > vfs_glusterfs to > > > just using a filesystem path to the same location, it > works fine > > > (except for the performance hit). All my searches > have led to bug > > > 1619108, and that seems to be the symptom, but there > doesn’t appear > > > to be any clear resolution. > > > > You figured out the right bug and following is the > upstream Samba bug: > > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13585 > > > > Unfortunately it is only available with v4.8.6 and > higher. If required > > I can patch it up and provide a build. > > > > > I’m on the latest version of samba available on CentOS > 7 (4.8.3) and > > > I’m on the latest available glusterfs 4.1 (4.1.6). Is > there > > > something simple I’m missing to get this going? > > > > > > Thank you! > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gluster-users mailing list > > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users I see either reintroduction if the same bug or something very similar in: samba-4.10.4-10.el7.x86_64 glusterfs-server-6.9-1.el7.x86_64 Disaster strikes again! Fcuking hell. Not being a developer I think the code from patches to <4.10 versions are now in the upstream(or Centos') trunk(certainly are not in patches). So now, after yesterday's update to Centos 7.8, samba+gluster render the same old: "The file '<%1 NULL:NameDest>' is too large for the destination file system.' Not good... very, very bad. regards, L ________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
