Hi Nithya,
I just reminded about your previous e-mail which left me with the impression that old volumes need that.
This is the one 1 mean:
>It looks like this is a replicate volume. If >that is the case then yes, you are >running an old version of Gluster for >which this was the default behaviour.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Nithya
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
On Sep 9, 2019 06:36, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 00:03, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg@yahoo.com> wrote:As it was mentioned, you might have to run rebalance on the other node - but it is better to wait this node is over.Hi Strahil,Rebalance does not need to be run on the other node - the operation is a volume wide one . Only a single node per replica set would migrate files in the version used in this case .Regards,NithyaBest Regards,Strahil NikolovВ петък, 6 септември 2019 г., 15:29:20 ч. Гринуич+3, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell@gmail.com> написа:On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:56 PM Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha@redhat.com> wrote:On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 02:41, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks for the replies. The rebalance is running and the brick percentages are not adjusting as expected:# df -hP |grep data
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv1_data 60T 49T 11T 83% /gluster_bricks/data1
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv2_data 60T 49T 11T 83% /gluster_bricks/data2
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv3_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data3
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv4_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data4
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv5_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data5
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv6_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data6At the current pace it looks like this will continue to run for another 5-6 days.I appreciate the guidance..What is the output of the rebalance status command?Can you check if there are any errors in the rebalance logs on the node on which you see rebalance activity?If there are a lot of small files on the volume, the rebalance is expected to take time.Regards,NithyaMy apologies, that was a typo. I meant to say:"The rebalance is running and the brick percentages are NOW adjusting as expected"I did expect the rebalance to take several days. The rebalance log is not showing any errors. Status output:# gluster vol rebalance tank status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 1251320 35.5TB 2079527 0 0 in progress 139:9:46
serverB 0 0Bytes 7 0 0 completed 63:47:55
volume rebalance: tank: successThanks again for the guidance.HB_______________________________________________On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:08 PM Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha@redhat.com> wrote:On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 22:59, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you for the reply.I started a rebalance with force on serverA as suggested. Now I see 'activity' on that node:# gluster vol rebalance tank status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 6143 6.1GB 9542 0 0 in progress 0:4:5
serverB 0 0Bytes 7 0 0 in progress 0:4:5
volume rebalance: tank: successBut I am not seeing any activity on serverB. Is this expected? Does the rebalance need to run on each node even though it says both nodes are 'in progress'?It looks like this is a replicate volume. If that is the case then yes, you are running an old version of Gluster for which this was the default behaviour.Regards,NithyaThanks,HB_______________________________________________On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 4:18 AM Strahil <hunter86_bg@yahoo.com> wrote:The rebalance status show 0 Bytes.
Maybe you should try with the 'gluster volume rebalance <VOLNAME> start force' ?
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovSource: https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#rebalancing-volumes
On Aug 30, 2019 20:04, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell@gmail.com> wrote:All,RHEL 7.5Gluster 3.8.152 Nodes: serverA & serverBI am not deeply knowledgeable about Gluster and it's administration but we have a 2 node cluster that's been running for about a year and a half. All has worked fine to date. Our main volume has consisted of two 60TB bricks on each of the cluster nodes. As we reached capacity on the volume we needed to expand. So, we've added four new 60TB bricks to each of the cluster nodes. The bricks are now seen, and the total size of the volume is as expected:# gluster vol status tank
Status of volume: tank
Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data1 49162 0 Y 20318
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data1 49166 0 Y 3432
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data2 49163 0 Y 20323
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data2 49167 0 Y 3435
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data3 49164 0 Y 4625
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data4 49165 0 Y 4644
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data5 49166 0 Y 5088
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data6 49167 0 Y 5128
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data3 49168 0 Y 22314
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data4 49169 0 Y 22345
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data5 49170 0 Y 22889
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data6 49171 0 Y 22932
Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y 22981
Self-heal Daemon on serverA.example.com N/A N/A Y 6202After adding the bricks we ran a rebalance from serverA as:# gluster volume rebalance tank startThe rebalance completed:# gluster volume rebalance tank status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 completed 3:7:10
serverA.example.com 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 completed 0:0:0
volume rebalance: tank: successHowever, when I run a df, the two original bricks still show all of the consumed space (this is the same on both nodes):# df -hP
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg0-root 5.0G 625M 4.4G 13% /
devtmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev
tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 32G 67M 32G 1% /run
tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/vg0-usr 20G 3.6G 17G 18% /usr
/dev/md126 1014M 228M 787M 23% /boot
/dev/mapper/vg0-home 5.0G 37M 5.0G 1% /home
/dev/mapper/vg0-opt 5.0G 37M 5.0G 1% /opt
/dev/mapper/vg0-tmp 5.0G 33M 5.0G 1% /tmp
/dev/mapper/vg0-var 20G 2.6G 18G 13% /var
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv1_data 60T 59T 1.1T 99% /gluster_bricks/data1
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv2_data 60T 58T 1.3T 98% /gluster_bricks/data2
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv3_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data3
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv4_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data4
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv5_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data5
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv6_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data6
localhost:/tank 355T 116T 239T 33% /mnt/tankWe were thinking that the used space would be distributed across the now 6 bricks after rebalance. Is that not what a rebalance does? Is this expected behavior?Can anyone provide some guidance as to what the behavior here and if there is anything that we need to do at this point?Thanks in advance,HB
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
