Hi Kaleb,
I would recommend you v6.
Curently I'm running hyperconverged setup with oVirt (latest) + gluster v6.3 and everything is quite well.
Also, keep in mind there multiple enhancements adopted with v6 and if any issue arise - the dev will prioritize it.
Also, v6 will have longer support compared to the other options, which means that you will have plenty of time before you have to think about migration.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
On Jul 23, 2019 14:21, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:36 AM Gionatan Danti <g.danti@assyoma.it> wrote:Hi list,
I have a question about recommended gluster stable version for using to
host virtual disk images.
From my understanding, current RHGS uses the latest 3.x gluster branch.
This is also the same version provided by default in RHEL/CentOS;
[root@localhost ~]# yum info glusterfs.x86_64
...
Name : glusterfs
Arch : x86_64
Version : 3.12.2
Release : 18.el7
Size : 542 k
Repo : base/7/x86_64
...
At the same time, CentOS SIG enables version 4.0, 4.1, 5.x and 6.x.That's true, but the glusterfs-3.12.x packages are still available on the CentOS mirrors.I'm not sure why the centos-release-gluster312 package has been removed from the mirrors, but you can still get it from https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6530It seems odd to me that centos-release-gluster312 would have been removed when RHEL is still shipping — for a little while longer anyway — glusterfs-3.12 (client side) packages.--Kaleb
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
