Dear colleagues,
I have a lab with a bunch of virtual machines (the virtualization is
provided by KVM) running on the same physical host. 4 of these VMs are
working as a GlusterFS cluster and there's one more VM that works as a
client. I'll specify all the packages' versions in the ending of this
message.
I created 2 volumes - one is having type "Distributed-Replicate" and
another one is "Distribute". The problem is that both of volumes are
showing really poor performance.
Here's what I see on the client:
$ mount | grep gluster
10.13.1.16:storage1 on /mnt/glusterfs1 type fuse.glusterfs(rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072)
10.13.1.16:storage2 on /mnt/glusterfs2 type fuse.glusterfs(rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072)
$ for i in {1..5}; do { dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/glusterfs1/test.tmp bs=1M count=10 oflag=sync; rm -f /mnt/glusterfs1/test.tmp; } done
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.47936 s, 7.1 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.62546 s, 6.5 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.71229 s, 6.1 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.68607 s, 6.2 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.82204 s, 5.8 MB/s
$ for i in {1..5}; do { dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/glusterfs2/test.tmp bs=1M count=10 oflag=sync; rm -f /mnt/glusterfs2/test.tmp; } done
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.15739 s, 9.1 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.978528 s, 10.7 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.910642 s, 11.5 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.998249 s, 10.5 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.03377 s, 10.1 MB/s
The distributed one shows a bit better performance than the
distributed-replicated one, but it's still poor. :-(
The disk storage itself is OK, here's what I see on each of 4 GlusterFS
servers:
for i in {1..5}; do { dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/storage1/test.tmp bs=1M count=10 oflag=sync; rm -f /mnt/storage1/test.tmp; } done
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.0656698 s, 160 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.0476927 s, 220 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.036526 s, 287 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.0329145 s, 319 MB/s
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.0403988 s, 260 MB/s
The network between all 5 VMs is OK, they all are working on the same
physical host.
Can't understand, what am I doing wrong. :-(
Here's the detailed info about the volumes:
Volume Name: storage1
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: a42e2554-99e5-4331-bcc4-0900d002ae32
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: gluster1.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage1/brick1
Brick2: gluster2.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage1/brick2
Brick3: gluster3.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage1/brick_arbiter (arbiter)
Brick4: gluster3.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage1/brick3
Brick5: gluster4.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage1/brick4
Brick6: gluster1.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage1/brick_arbiter (arbiter)
Options Reconfigured:
transport.address-family: inet
nfs.disable: on
performance.client-io-threads: off
Volume Name: storage2
Type: Distribute
Volume ID: df4d8096-ad03-493e-9e0e-586ce21fb067
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 4
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: gluster1.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage2
Brick2: gluster2.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage2
Brick3: gluster3.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage2
Brick4: gluster4.k8s.maitre-d.tucha.ua:/mnt/storage2
Options Reconfigured:
transport.address-family: inet
nfs.disable: on
The OS is CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810. The packages I'm using are:
glusterfs-6.3-1.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-api-6.3-1.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-cli-6.3-1.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-client-xlators-6.3-1.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-6.3-1.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-libs-6.3-1.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-server-6.3-1.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-514.2.2.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-957.12.1.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-957.12.2.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64
kernel-tools-3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64
kernel-tools-libs-3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_6
Please, be so kind as to help me to understand, did I do it wrong or
that's quite normal performance of GlusterFS?
Thanks in advance!
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
