Re: No healing on peer disconnect - is it correct?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can someone advice on this, please?

BR!

Dňa 3. 6. 2019 o 18:58 užívateľ Martin <snowmailer@xxxxxxxxx> napísal:

> Hi all,
> 
> I need someone to explain if my gluster behaviour is correct. I am not sure if my gluster works as it should. I have simple Replica 3 - Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3.
> 
> When one of my hypervisor is disconnected as peer, i.e. gluster process is down but bricks running, other two healthy nodes start signalling that they lost one peer. This is correct.
> Next, I restart gluster process on node where gluster process failed and I thought It should trigger healing of files on failed node but nothing is happening.
> 
> I run VMs disks on this gluster volume. No healing is triggered after gluster restart, remaining two nodes get peer back after restart of gluster and everything is running without down time.
> Even VMs that are running on “failed” node where gluster process was down (bricks were up) are running without down time. 
> 
> Is this behaviour correct? I mean No healing is triggered after peer is reconnected back and VMs.
> 
> Thanks for explanation.
> 
> BR!
> Martin 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux