On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Artem Russakovskii wrote:
When we first started with glusterfs and version 3 last year, we also had a ton of performance issues, especially with small files. I've made several reports at the time, hopefully some of them helped. However, at some point, possibly after updating to v4 (currently using 4.0.2), the performance issues went away. Poof. I imagine when we upgrade further, performance may improve even more. When we were running v3, I was desperately considering alternatives/competitors. Not anymore, gluster has performed perfectly and without a single durability issue for almost a year now.
If I understood correctly you only have two bricks, is that correct? I'm working at a site with gazillions of bricks and the performance is terrible, and I suspect there's a sweetspot where you don't want too many bricks compared to nodes. It would be interesting to investigate that further.
/andreas -- "economics is a pseudoscience; the astrology of our time" Kim Stanley Robinson _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
