Performance question: Replicated with RAID0, or Distributed with RAID5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi everyone. I have a question about performance, hoping that perhaps someone has already tested these scenarios so that I don't have to.

In order to maximize a Gluster array's performance, which is faster: Gluster servers with 6 SAS disks each set up in a RAID0 configuration, letting Gluster handle the data duplication, or letting the servers handle data integrity with some kind of striped RAID configuration, and setting Gluster up in a Distributed configuration?

My hypothesis is that the latter is actually faster because data integrity is handled in hardware, especially if the load is distributed over several Gluster servers. Half of our use involves large VM files, and the other half is in e-mail, with lots of random writes to small files. So far, we've got 4 servers to dedicate to this task, although under the right circumstances, that can be changed.

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux