|
On 03/07/18 14:47, Jim Kinney wrote:
[snip].
The gluster-fuse
client works but is slower than most people like. I use the fuse
process in my setup at work. ...
Depending on the use case and configuration. With client-side
caching and cache invalidation, a good number of the performance
complaints can be addressed in a similar (better) way to how nfs
makes things fast.
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:50 -0500, Ben Mason wrote:
Hello,
I'm designing a 2-node, HA NAS that must support NFS. I
had planned on using GlusterFS native NFS until I saw that
it is being deprecated. Then, I was going to use GlusterFS +
NFS-Ganesha until I saw that the Ganesha HA support ended
after 3.10 and its replacement is still a WIP. So, I landed
on GlusterFS + kernel NFS + corosync & pacemaker, which
seems to work quite well. Are there any performance issues
or other concerns with using GlusterFS as a replication
layer and kernel NFS on top of that?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
James P. Kinney III
Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you
gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his
own tail. It won't fatten the dog.
- Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain
http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
|
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
