On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug > configuration' off google. Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't > help alot: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html > > Hence the ask here. storhaug feels like it's not moving with any sort > of update now. > > Any plans to move back to the previous NFS Ganesha HA model with > upcoming GlusterFS versions as a result? No. (re)writing or finishing storhaug has been on my plate ever since the guy who was supposed to do it didn't. I have lots of other stuff to do too. All I can say is it'll get done when it gets done. > > In the meantime I'll look to cobble up the GlusterFS 3.10 packages and > try with those per your suggestion. > > What's your thoughts on using HAPROXY / keepalived w/ NFS Ganesha and > GlusterFS? Anyone tried this sort of combination? I want to avoid the > situation where I have to remount clients as a result of a node failing. > In other words, avoid this situation: > > [root@yes01 ~]# cd /n > -bash: cd: /n: Stale file handle > [root@yes01 ~]# > > Cheers, > Tom > >> On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: >>> On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: >>> + gluster users as well. Just read another post on the mailing lists >>> about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. >> >> That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. >> >> Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. >> >> If you need HA, that is one "out of the box" option. >> >> There's support for using CTDB in Samba for Ganesha HA, and people have >> used it successfully with Gluster+Ganesha. >> >>> >>> Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS >>> Ganesha then? >> >> Not that I'm aware of. >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tom >>> >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>> I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each >>>> node. ATM the configs are identical between the two NFS Ganesha >>>> hosts. (Probably shouldn't be but I'm just testing things out.) >>>> >>>> I need HA capability and notice these instructions here: >>>> >>>> http://aravindavkgluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Configuring%20HA%20NFS%20Server/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> However I don't have package glusterfs-ganesha available on this >>>> CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) and the maintainer's of CentOS 7 >>>> haven't uploaded some of the 2.5.x packages yet so I can't use that >>>> version. >>>> >>>> glusterfs-api-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-libs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-fuse-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-server-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> python2-glusterfs-api-1.1-1.el7.noarch >>>> glusterfs-client-xlators-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> glusterfs-cli-3.12.6-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> >>>> nfs-ganesha-xfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> nfs-ganesha-vfs-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> nfs-ganesha-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.3.2-1.el7.x86_64 >>>> >>>> The only high availability packages are the following but they don't >>>> come with any instructions that I can find: >>>> >>>> storhaug.noarch : High-Availability Add-on for NFS-Ganesha and Samba >>>> storhaug-nfs.noarch : storhaug NFS-Ganesha module >>>> >>>> Given that I'm missing that one package above, will configuring using >>>> ganesha-ha.conf still work? Or should I be looking at another option >>>> alltogether? >>>> >>>> Appreciate any help. Ty! >>>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
