I definately prefer replica 2 arbiter 1.
It makes more sense and is more accurate, since that scenario has only
two copies of the actual data.
-wk
On 12/20/2017 2:14 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
Hi,
The existing syntax in the gluster CLI for creating arbiter volumes is
`gluster volume create <volname> replica 3 arbiter 1 <list of bricks>`
. It means (or at least intended to mean) that out of the 3 bricks, 1
brick is the arbiter.
There has been some feedback while implementing arbiter support in
glusterd2 for glusterfs-4.0 that we should change this to `replica 2
arbiter 1` , meaning that there are 2 replica (data) bricks and the
3rd one is the arbiter (which only holds meta data).
See [1] for some discussions. What does everyone feel is more user
friendly and intuitive?
Thanks,
Ravi
[1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterd2/pull/480
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
