Hi,
I have a 5-nodes GlusterFS cluster with Distributed-Replicate. There are 180 bricks in total. The OS is CentOS6.5, and GlusterFS is 3.11.0. I find many bricks are offline when we generate some empty files and rename them. I see xfs call trace in every node.
For example,
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: XFS (rdc00d28p2): Internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1948 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffffa04e33f9
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel:
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: Pid: 9939, comm: glusterfsd Tainted: G --------------- H 2.6.32-prsys.1.1.0.13.x86_64 #1
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: Call Trace:
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffffa04c803f>] ? xfs_error_report+0x3f/0x50 [xfs]
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffffa04e33f9>] ? xfs_rename+0x2c9/0x6c0 [xfs]
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffffa04e5e39>] ? xfs_trans_cancel+0xd9/0x100 [xfs]
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffffa04e33f9>] ? xfs_rename+0x2c9/0x6c0 [xfs]
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff811962c5>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x25/0xb0
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffffa04f5a06>] ? xfs_vn_rename+0x66/0x70 [xfs]
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff81184580>] ? vfs_rename+0x2a0/0x500
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff81182cd6>] ? generic_permission+0x16/0xa0
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff811882d9>] ? sys_renameat+0x369/0x420
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff81185f06>] ? final_putname+0x26/0x50
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff81186189>] ? putname+0x29/0x40
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff811861f9>] ? user_path_at+0x59/0xa0
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff8151dc79>] ? unroll_tree_refs+0x16/0xbc
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff810d1698>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x2d8/0x300
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff811883ab>] ? sys_rename+0x1b/0x20
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: [<ffffffff8100b032>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: XFS (rdc00d28p2): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x8) called from line 1949 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Return address = 0xffffffffa04e5e52
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: XFS (rdc00d28p2): Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem
Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: XFS (rdc00d28p2): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
Nov 16 11:15:30 node10 disks-FAvUzxiL-brick[29742]: [2017-11-16 11:15:30.206208] M [MSGID: 113075] [posix-helpers.c:1891:posix_health_check_thread_proc] 0-data-posix: health-check failed, going down
Nov 16 11:15:30 node10 disks-FAvUzxiL-brick[29742]: [2017-11-16 11:15:30.206538] M [MSGID: 113075] [posix-helpers.c:1908:posix_health_check_thread_proc] 0-data-posix: still alive! -> SIGTERM
Nov 16 11:15:37 node10 kernel: XFS (sdm): xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
Nov 16 11:16:07 node10 kernel: XFS (sdm): xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.
I think probably it's not related to the hard disk because it can be reproduced and it occurs for different bricks. All the hard disks are new and I don't see any low level IO error. Is it a bug related to xfs or GlusterFS? Is there a workaround?
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
