Restrict root clients / experimental patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi All,

I would like to use glusterfs in an environment where storage servers are managed by an IT service - myself :) - and several users in the organization can mount the distributed fs. The users are root on their machines.
As far as I know about glusterfs, a root client user may impersonate any uid/gid since it provides its uid/gid itself when it talks to the bricks (like nfsv3).
The thing is, we want to enforce permissions, i.e. user X may only access files shared with him even if he's root on his machine.
I found a draft spec about glusterfs+kerberos but not much more so I think it's not possible with glusterfs right now, correct?
(Also I feel that kerberos would be a bit heavy to manage)

---

An simple hack that I found is to add custom uid/gid fields in clients' ssl certificates. The bricks use the client's uid/gid specified in its certificate rather than using one specified by the user. This solution has no effect on performance and there's no need for a central authentication.
The thing that changes is the way client certificates are generated and glusterfsd needs a small patch.

I did an experimental implementation of this idea. Custom fields "1.2.3.4.5.6.7" and "1.2.3.4.5.6.8" are used for uid and gid.
I tried it with custom CA trusted by all bricks and I issued a few client certificates.
No server configuration is needed when a new client is added, when a client is revoked the a CRL must updated and pushed to all servers.
By the way I didn't get glusterfs servers to accept my CRLs, do some people use it?

Notes:
 * groups are not handled right now and since users may change groups regularly I don't think it would be a great idea to freeze them in a certificate. The bricks could possibly do an ldap lookup in order to retrieve and cache the groups for an uid.
 * Clients obviously can't modify their certificates because they are signed by CA

What do you think of this implementation, is it safe?
Do all client operations use auth_glusterfs_v2_authenticate or did I miss other codepaths?

Thanks!

Pierre Carru
eshard

PS: By the way I found the source code very clean and well organized, nice job :)
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux