Re: Confusing lstat() performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/09/17 16:51, Ben Turner wrote:
> I wouldn't mind, but I don't have your dataset.

Oh sorry, I thought I had posted that here but in fact I did so in a
different issue regarding getdents() performance (bug 1478411).

My benchmarking data set is trivial: 100k empty files.

In a directory on your gluster mount:

  seq 1 100000 | xargs touch

I found this simple benchmark data set (and even 10k empty files) to
exhibit the same lstat() problems as my directory with 1M files "real"
work load.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux