On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:21:38PM -0400, Amye Scavarda wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Michael Scherer <mscherer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Le vendredi 01 septembre 2017 à 14:02 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit : >> >> Le mercredi 30 août 2017 à 12:11 +0530, Nigel Babu a écrit : >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > To reduce confusion, we've setup docs.gluster.org pointing to >> >> > gluster.readthedocs.org. Both URLs will continue to work for the >> >> > forseeable >> >> > future. >> >> > >> >> > Please update any references that you control to point to >> >> > docs.gluster.org. At >> >> > some point in the distant future, we will switch to hosting >> >> > docs.gluster.org on >> >> > our own servers. >> >> > >> >> > RTD will set up a canonical link to docs.gluster.org[1]. Over time, >> >> > this will >> >> > change update the results on search engines to docs.gluster.org. >> >> > This >> >> > change >> >> > will reduce confusion we've had with copies of our docs hosted on >> >> > RTD. >> >> > >> >> > [1]: https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/canonical.html >> >> >> >> So , seems TLS certificate is wrong, should we correct the link to be >> >> http for now ? >> > >> > So I opened a few PR/review: >> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/pull/259 >> > >> > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18182/ >> > >> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/pull/148 >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Michael Scherer >> > Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gluster-devel mailing list >> > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx >> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> Fair warning, glusterweb is now deprecated as discussed in Community >> Meeting on 30 Aug. However, github.com/gluster/glusterweb will be used >> as a bug tracker moving forward. > > Could you please replace the contents of the current glusterweb > repository with a README explaining this? The old files can stay in the > history so that we can reference them in case something on the new > website needs to be re-added. > > Being able to send pull requests and get contributions from users that > way was one of the main reasons to move to GitHub. Is that still > possible with the new site, in a different repository? I guess WordPress > has some import/export features, but I don't know if those can get > nicely combined with a repository on GitHub. > > Thanks! > Niels So we're actually going to move forward in a different direction with the glusterweb repository once we get everything cleaned up. We'll still use the GitHub issue queue as a method of tracking improvements/bugs/feature requests , but I'd like to get us to a place where we have a WordPress theme that people can contribute to and code for custom plugins that we've developed. I'll be looking for volunteers that can edit content directly as well. I'll create a branch outlining what that could look like and we'll discuss at the next community meeting. - amye -- Amye Scavarda | amye@xxxxxxxxxx | Gluster Community Lead _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
